@InProceedings{PuntelCharPetr:2020:CoPeAn,
author = "Puntel, Fernando Emilio and Char{\~a}o, Andrea Schwertner and
Petry, Adriano",
affiliation = "{Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)} and {Universidade
Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)}",
title = "Comparative performance analysis of job scheduling algorithms in a
real-world scientific application",
booktitle = "Proceedings...",
year = "2020",
editor = "Gervasi, O. and Murgante, B. and Misra, S. and Garau, C. and
Blecic, I. and Taniar, D. and Apduhan, B. O. and Rocha, A. M. A.
C. and Tarantino, E. and Torre, C. M. and Karaca, Y.",
pages = "447--462",
organization = "International Conference on Computational Science and Its
Applications (ICCSA), 20.",
publisher = "Springer",
note = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science, v.12249",
keywords = "Job scheduling · High performance computing · SLURM and resource
management system.",
abstract = "In High Performance Computing, it is common to deal with
substantial computing resources, and the use of a Resource
Management System (RMS) becomes fundamental. The job scheduling
algorithm is a key part of a RMS, and the selection of the best
job scheduling that meets the user needs is of most relevance. In
this work, we use a real-world scientific application to evaluate
the performance of 4 different job scheduling algorithms: First
in, first out (FIFO), Shortest Job First (SJF), EASYbackfilling
and Fattened-backfilling. These algorithms worked with RMS SLURM
workload manager, considering a scientific application that
predicts the earths ionosphere dynamics. In the results we
highlight each algorithms strength and weakness for different
scenarios that change the possibility of advancing smaller jobs.
To deepen our analysis, we also compared the job scheduling
algorithms using 4 jobs of Numerical Aerodynamic Sampling (NAS)
Parallel Benchmarks in a controlled scenario.",
conference-location = "Cagliari, Italy",
conference-year = "01-04 July",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-58799-4_74",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58799-4_74",
isbn = "978-303058798-7",
issn = "03029743",
language = "en",
targetfile = "puntel_comparatie.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "12 maio 2024"
}